mp3 in the dark days of my windows media player usage ). I used MC for ripping for a few years, but then I needed to re-rip a thousand or so CDs (ripped to. If you're ripping more than one or two discs at a time, the time savings using accurate rip can be very substantial. Secure ripping necessarily involves reading the CD (at least) twice. That said, I use dBpoweramp for ripping, but not for audio quality, but because there are two "convenience" advantages to using dBpoweramp to rip:ġ) Accurate Rip may not be more accurate than a secure rip, but accurate rip only reads the CD once (if there are no read errors). I agree with Jim that there should be no sound quality difference between an MC rip and a dBpoweramp rip, so if you're only concerned about sound quality, MC is perfectly fine for ripping. So my question is, how does the latest version of JRiver compare to the latest version of dBpoweramp for ripping CDs in terms of quality? I realize we all hear differently, just seeking people's opinions and reasoning. He then went on to say however, that he hadn't used recent iterations of JRiver, so his comparison was based on JRiver version 18 and 19 vs dBPoweramp. So a friend of mine (who works for a high end audio retailer and who's opinion I've come to trust over the years) recommended JRiver to me, but said I should use dBpoweramp to rip my CDs instead of JRiver's built-in rip. a lot of it's over my head.Īnyways, as a high end audio enthusiast, I want to get the best sound quality I possibly can. In the mean time I'm researching all I can, and, needless to say, it's a bit daunting. I'm on PC and will be using JRiver for the first time ever once I receive and install my new 1TB SSD (couple days).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |